Norton and UK HealthCare formalize the collaboration they announced almost a year and a half ago

UK HealthCare and Norton Healthcare have formalized the collaboration they announced almost a year and a half ago and will "focus on creating collaborations with hospitals across the state in stroke, cardiovascular and cancer care," Dr. Michael Karpf, executive vice president for health affairs at the University of Kentucky, announced today.

Said Steve Williams, president and CEO of Norton: "Our intent is to bring our combined health care expertise and resources into communities across the commonwealth to improve health-care outcomes."

The partnership will be in the form of a non-profit organization. The board of the Norton-UK HealthCare Partnership for Quality has already approved a budget of $595,000 to grow stroke outreach and education and launch programs to fight heart attacks and cancer, a press release says.

In late 2010, the two systems joined forces to create a statewide collaboration that addresses Kentucky's major health issues, including cancer, stroke and heart disease that stem from high obesity and smoking rates. Some of the accomplishments since the agreement include a transplant program, an effort to increase the number of obstetricians statewide; pharmacy education; and cancer care.

A competing collaboration, between the University of Louisville, Jewish Hospital and the Lexington-based St. Joseph Health System, is again trying to formalize its arrangement following rejection of a merger by state officials on grounds that University Hospital was a public institution that could not be bound by the Catholic system's restrictions on reproductive care.

Conflicting interpretations abound regarding CBO's report about cost, coverage of Affordable Care Act

By Tara Kaprowy
Kentucky Health News

Since the Congressional Budget Office released a report with revised estimates about how many people the Affordable Care Act will cover and how much it will cost, it has spawned a whirlwind of op-ed pieces with vastly opposing interpretations.

According to Julian Pecquet in The Hill, the estimate showed the federal health-care reform law will allow 30 million more people to get insurance coverage by 2016, down from the previous estimate of 32 million. Thus, the law's coverage provisions are now estimated to cost $1.083 trillion over the next 10 years, $50 billion less than last year's projection.

The CBO also estimates that 4 million Americans will lose their employer-sponsored health insurance by 2016, not the mere 1 million figure projected last year. It also estimates that 1 to 2 million fewer people will qualify for state health-insurance exchanges than initially thought, but an additional 1 million will qualify for Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Provision, known in Kentucky as K-CHIP.

"CBO faults a slower than anticipated recovery for the soft numbers, along with technical changes to CBO's estimating procedures and legislative changes adopted over the past year," Pecquet reports. The changes in cost estimates are "due in part to slower growth in health-care spending resulting in an 8 percent drop in premiums, as well as taxes and penalties paid by employers and their workers as struggling businesses cut down on employer-sponsored coverage," Pecquet writes.

Conn Carroll, senior editorial writer for The Washington Examiner, has an entirely different view, saying the cost has doubled. "The gross cost of President Obama's health care law has risen from $940 billion when the bill was passed, to $1.76 trillion today. This did not sit well with Obamacare's leftist apologists," he writes. Carroll uses gross figures to arrive at his calculations.

Carroll is comparing apples to oranges, and the estimate hasn't doubled, writes Ezra Klein of The Washington Post. "The disparity in the cost estimates only comes when you take a different sample of years, in which the law is doing different things, in an economy of a different size. And even then, costs went up only if you take "gross" costs rather than "net" costs, which is a rather unusual way to think about the budget."

Paul Krugman of The New York Times weighs in too, but not on the numbers. He does say, "For all its imperfections, this reform would do an enormous amount of good. And one indicator of just how good it is comes from the apparent inability of its opponents to make an honest case against it."

Krugman said "most of the disinformation" about the reform is about costs. "Each new report from the Congressional Budget Office is touted as proof that the true cost of Obamacare is exploding, even when — as was the case with the latest report — the document says on its very first page that projected costs have actually fallen slightly."

CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf defended in his blog the changes in estimates. "We will continue to update our estimates regarding health insurance coverage as new information becomes available about the implementation of the ACA, underlying trends in the health-care and health financial systems, and the probable responses to the legislation by businesses, families and others."

Affordable Care Act helping families, seniors in rural areas, agriculture secretary says on its second anniversary

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is already making an impact, including for people who live in rural America. That was the message from Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack today on the second anniversary of the enactment of the federal health-care reform law.

In a teleconference, Vilsack noted several pieces of the law that are benefitting people, including the 2.5 million young adults who have insurance coverage because parents can keep them on their plan up to age 26. "That's providing a degree of comfort to moms and dads," he said.

The law has also helped 3.6 million seniors on Medicare, who saved $2.1 billion on their prescription drugs in 2011 because the law allowed them to get a 50 percent discount on brand-name drugs. Vilsack said seniors saved an average of $600 last year and were also "able to get a number of services, including preventive services like mammograms, for free."

Under the law, insurance companies are now required to spend 80 percent of their premium dollars on "actual health care, not overhead," Vilsack said, and they are not allowed to increase their premiums by more than 10 percent without an explanation. Children who were previously denied coverage because of pre-existing conditions can no longer denied, as per the law's mandate, and "in a couple of years that will extend to all people," Vilsack said. And thousands of new primary-care doctors and nurses are being encouraged to practice in rural areas and will receive higher payments.

Vilsack said his Department of Agriculture is working to improve the rural health-care landscape, through a joint effort with the USDA Rural Development division and the Department for Health and Human Services. In the past three years, Vilsack said 730 counties have received grants so they can "embrace telemedicine." Nearly 600 health-care facilities in rural communities have received money to fund equipment like CT scans, MRIs, ultrasound and lab equipment, Vilsack said. And rural citizens can now get care from a hospital outside their health plan's network when there is no time to get to a hospital that is farther away.

"No one should have to go without health care because of where they live, and for too long, rural Americans have been getting the short end of the health-care stick," he said. "The Affordable Care Act is helping millions of young people access health care, strengthening Medicare, and training thousands of new doctors to serve rural areas to give middle-class families the health security they deserve." (Read more)

Reform act good for kids, Kentucky Youth Advocates head says

This week marks the second anniversary of the Affordable Care Act and debate about its cost and benefits continues to be vigorous. But one thing that can't be denied "is that the ACA, on a most basic level, benefits vulnerable kids in Kentucky," writes Terry Brooks, right, executive director of Kentucky Youth Advocates, in an op-ed piece in the Lexington Herald-Leader.

"Today, because of the ACA, kids with pre-existing conditions like diabetes and asthma can't be denied the care they need," he writes. "And children across Kentucky are receiving preventive care like immunizations without their parents having to pay out-of-pocket costs so they can avoid illness and we can avoid unnecessary health care costs for preventable problems."

Brooks also notes that the ACA allows children to be covered under parents' insurance up to age 26.

If provisions of the ACA are not revoked, children can continue to benefit into their adulthood, Brooks writes: "They'll be protected from their insurance companies placing lifetime caps on their coverage and benefits, so if a child beats leukemia at age eight, she will still be able to get the care she needs if she relapses at age 20." That will translates to 360,000 children in Kentucky being protected. "And more than 180,000 Kentucky children will be able to receive preventative care such as well-child visits and other screenings with no out-of-pocket costs," he writes.

"So, yes, let's debate the pros and cons," he said. "But let's not deny the simple fact that the ACA is good for kids, and kids should be spared from the politics and animosity of this debate." (Read more)